MADEIRA
Constitutional Court of Portugal has declared the unconstitutionality of the law requesting the anticipative payment of an advance on Portuguese corporate tax (PEC, for its initial in Portuguese)
Following its verdict dated September 29, 2009, the Constitutional Court of Portugal has declared the unconstitutionality of the law requesting an advance payment on Portuguese corporate tax (PEC, for its initial on Portuguese), which as you know, all companies licensed to operate in the International Business Centre of Madera (CINM) were subjected to.
The source of the unconstitutionality can be found in the request for an anticipated payment of an advance on Portuguese corporate tax to which companies of Madeira are not subjected. It is important to note that insofar as the payment of the PEC was applied during several years, the Court devoted the non-retroactive effect of its verdict because a refunding of the sums previously paid would imply substantial administrative costs. Consequently, the Court has specified that its judgment will only have effects for the future. However, the principle of non-retroactivity will not be applicable in cases of a dispute that has arisen prior to the judgement of the Constitutional Court but for which a decision has not yet been taken by a Portuguese court or concerning decisions that are still pending.
Consequently, and in accordance with the case law developed here before, the amounts paid are not recoverable.
SPAIN
Special Fiscal Regime for Patents
On February 13, 2008, by virtue of the rules on state aids, the European Commission authorized the special fiscal regime applicable to the income generated by the cession of patent licences, designs, models, plans, secret formulas and processes of Spanish companies and permanent establishments. This special regime was introduced by Law 16/2007 of July 4, 2007 and complemented with Article 23 of the Corporate Income Tax Law. According to this new regime, 50% of the income from the above mentioned licences will not be included in the taxable base when the prerequisites specified in this article are met.
It must noted that this exemption is applied to gross income and hence expenses inherent to the development (amortizations) are deductible, making the effective tax substantially low.
The rules allow applying this regime to intra-group transactions, even when the patent’s beneficiary is in the same country.
This regime is applicable as long as the income from the intangible assets cession licenses do not exceed six times the expenses incurred to develop the patent.
Fiscal Modifications
Capital Gains Tax: The capital gains tax has been eliminated as part of the Economic Stimulus Plan, as of 2009 income tax filings.
VAT Return: For companies that voluntarily request it, VAT return could be done on a monthly basis, instead of annually as has been done so far.
CHILE
Holding Companies Regime
Article 41D from Chile’s Income Tax Law introduced a special fiscal regime applicable to companies whose activities are exclusively as holding companies.
These companies, called Investment Platforms, have legal personality, fiscal domicile in Chile and are exempt from income tax. Companies under this law benefit from Chile’s double taxation treaties.
This special regime created in 2001, is not well known because it is under a process of adaptation / clarifications thanks to the Administrative Law office of Chile’s Internal Revenue Services.
The most important issue of this special regime is the total income tax exemption for companies exclusively dedicated to participate and manage their subsidiaries. This means, that these companies, besides the income from collecting dividends that is exempted, may also invoice their own subsidiaries for support administrative services. The income from this source is also exempted from corporate income tax.
The company is not exempted from the other taxes, such as VAT, Territorial Tax, Municipal Patents, and Inheritance and Donations tax. In the case of VAT tax, the company may request its reimbursement as long as its foreign subsidiaries cannot deduct it and they do not introduce products or services to Chile as their main activity.
Chile begins to enjoy a wide range of fiscal treaties. Currently it has 14 treaties approved: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Ecuador, Spain, France, Mexico, New Zeland, Norway, Peru, Poland, South Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom; and the following on ratification phase: Belgium, Colombia, Ireland, Malasya, Paraguay, Portugal, Russia, Switzerland, and Thailand. Currently under negotiations are the tax treaties with: Australia, Austria, China, Cuba, Finland, Hungary, India, Italy, Kuwait, the Czech Republic, The Netherlands, the United States, Uruguay, and Venezuela.
BELGIUM
With its goal of attracting investors and companies looking
for maximum tax advantages using Belgium holding companies
(known as investment platforms), the government of Belgium
has issued important laws:
| 1. |
It eliminated the
capital tax since January 2006. From that date on, capital
increases are tax free for Belgium holding companies. |
| 2. |
It issued a law on June 22 2005
, published it on October 3, 2005; later on modified
it on December 23, 2005; and finally published it on
December 30, 2005 which implements the ‘risk capital’
concept. This law allows deducting a percentage of the
company’s own funds as expenses; hence reducing
its tax base. This percentage is variable and indexed
on the Government 10-year obligations’ rate of
return. Currently, this figure is around 4%. This means
that the 1.7% tax applicable to holding companies (refer
to our December 2005 note) is reduced or even eliminated
depending upon the amount of the company’s own
funds. |
| 3.
|
The dividends withholding tax
has been eliminated for all countries which have signed
double taxation treaties with Belgium. Hence, under
certain circumstances, there is no tax cost for dividends
paid from a Belgium holding company and its partner
located on a jurisdiction with a tax treaty. |
|